I have two SQL SERVERs and I would like to establish a simple architecture
of one Publisher and one SUbscriber. the catch is that I would like to use
SQL 2005 EXPRESS as my source DB - Production Server (even though, as far as
I understand, it can only be a Subscriber) and SQL SERVER 2005 STANDARD will
be the replica DB (even though it will probebly have to be Publisher).
So, is it pusible that SQL SERVER STANDARD, which acts as a Publisher, be
able to make a Pull operation (and it will be replica DB) from SQL SERVER
EXPRESS, which acts as a Subscriber (and it will be the source DB)?
It is important to note that at the moment the SQL SERVER EXPRESS is used as
the only SERVER we have and it is operational.
I would like to add SQL SERVER 2005 STANDARD in order to let it pull every 5
minutes (or so) the SQL SERVER 2005 EXPRESS and copy all the changes made in
the existing SQL 2005 EXPRESS operational server.
I do not have the option to shutdown the SQL 2005 EXPRESS SERVER in order to
upgrade it to a STANDARD vertion.
Thanks in advanced
Yossi
You can use merge replication for this. However your SQL Server Standard
will have to be the publisher which can push to the Express version.
Why do you need a pull on the SQL Server standard machine?
RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"yoffir" <yoffir@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5A0216BC-5D31-4AF2-B6BE-3A1B266C9A75@.microsoft.com...
> Hello,
> I have two SQL SERVERs and I would like to establish a simple architecture
> of one Publisher and one SUbscriber. the catch is that I would like to use
> SQL 2005 EXPRESS as my source DB - Production Server (even though, as far
> as
> I understand, it can only be a Subscriber) and SQL SERVER 2005 STANDARD
> will
> be the replica DB (even though it will probebly have to be Publisher).
> So, is it pusible that SQL SERVER STANDARD, which acts as a Publisher, be
> able to make a Pull operation (and it will be replica DB) from SQL SERVER
> EXPRESS, which acts as a Subscriber (and it will be the source DB)?
> It is important to note that at the moment the SQL SERVER EXPRESS is used
> as
> the only SERVER we have and it is operational.
> I would like to add SQL SERVER 2005 STANDARD in order to let it pull every
> 5
> minutes (or so) the SQL SERVER 2005 EXPRESS and copy all the changes made
> in
> the existing SQL 2005 EXPRESS operational server.
> I do not have the option to shutdown the SQL 2005 EXPRESS SERVER in order
> to
> upgrade it to a STANDARD vertion.
> Thanks in advanced
> Yossi
>
|||I want to save the huge fee fore having a license for the STANDARD version.
The database is used by many users and a license will give Bill Gats 7000$
extra to his bank account.
Currently we are using the EXPRESS version free of charge.
I would like to have a replica of that database in a remote site.
The thing is that it is pusible that our programmers will use the replica
database and make changes to it. So, the original EXPRESS database must not
be updated by the replica database.
This is why I thought to use a publisher STANDARD database as a replica and
pull the subscriber EXPRESS database every 5 minutes for changes.
If I will use a publisher STANDARD server I will have to pay only 800$ for a
single user license (sa).
Hope I didn't confuse you

"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> You can use merge replication for this. However your SQL Server Standard
> will have to be the publisher which can push to the Express version.
> Why do you need a pull on the SQL Server standard machine?
> --
> RelevantNoise.com - dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
> "yoffir" <yoffir@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:5A0216BC-5D31-4AF2-B6BE-3A1B266C9A75@.microsoft.com...
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment